Release:2021, Vol. 5. № 3 (17)
About the author:Aleksander P. Pavlov, Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Siberian Federal University (Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation); ORCID: 0000-0001-6706-8374; firstname.lastname@example.org
The problems raised in the article by A. V. Ivanov and Yu. V. Popkov “Spiritual and ecological civilizational perspective: the value potential of youth in the Siberian context”, published in the journal “Siberian society” no. 1 (2021), are very relevant in conditions of serious internal and external “challenges”: coronavirus, sanctions of a number of countries against Russia, “brain drain”, especially among young people, the need for radical modernization of society in the context of globalization etc. Siberia is undoubtedly one of the centers of the Eurasian civilization. Siberia is a region not only with the richest natural resources, but, no less important, human resources. The main “human capital” is youth. The author of the article rightly notes the leading role of youth in modern socio-political and economic transformations. At the same time, “human capital”, and above all the youth potential of Siberia, is being used ineffectively. Moreover, young people, not seeing opportunities for self-realization in the Siberian region, find such opportunities outside its borders (in Moscow, St. Petersburg, and other countries). The “brain drain” of young people is an acute problem not only in Siberia, but throughout Russia. This article is about the topic of the spiritual and ethical component of modern civilizational processes, in which the social identity formation of young people takes a significant place. At the same time, some critical remarks were made about the article by A. V. Ivanov and Yu. V. Popkov. In particular, the expediency of referring to the experience of the past, to those values and morals that existed more than a hundred years ago, is questioned. Certain conclusions controversy of the article under discussion is noted. Although, according to the author, it is precisely in their ambiguity that its heuristic potential lies, since they encourage discussion and the formation of new approaches. The article highlights and analyzes three main paradigms of modernization. On the basis of N. Luhmann’s approach, the structure of the civilizational order as an autopoietic system is formulated. The necessity of preserving the unique socio-cultural landscapes of Siberia is substantiated.
Anisimova A. A., Yechevskaya O. G. 2013. “Siberian identity as a factor of sustainable development of Siberia”. All-Russian economic journal ECO, no. 1 (463), pp. 58-76. [In Russian]
Drobizheva L. M. 2020. “Russian identity: search for definition and dynamics of distribution”. Sociological research, no. 8, pp. 37-50. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250009460-9 [In Russian]
Popkova Yu. V. (ed.). 2010. Eurasian world: values, constants, self-organization. Novosibirsk: Nonparel. 449 p. [In Russian]
Zinoviev V. P. 2017. “Siberia in modern Russia: historical traditions and prospects of modernization”. Bulletin of the Tomsk State University. History, no. 46, pp. 81-84. [In Russian]
Ivanov A. V., Fotieva I. V., Shishin M. Yu. 2014. “On the paths to a new civilization (essays on the spiritual and ecological worldview)”. Barnaul: AltGTU Publishing House. 219 p. [In Russian]
Ivanov A. V. 2019. “Familiarization and development of Siberia as the third Russian strategic geoproject”. Bulletin of Omsk State University, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 84-95. [In Russian]
Krainov G. N. 2021. “Catching up modernization of Russia: past and present”. Social sciences and modernity, no. 2, pp. 79-89. [In Russian]
Nemirovsky V. G., Nemirovskaya A. V. 2018. “Social competitiveness: chances of success among youth and adults”. Sociological journal, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 135-149. [In Russian]
Nemirovsky V. G., Nemirovskaya A. V. 2013. Socio-cultural modernization of regions of Siberia: monograph. St. Petersburg: Petropolis. 200 p. [In Russian]
Reznik Yu. M. 2020. “Images of the civilizational future of Russia: individual projects and opportunities for their integration. Section 1”. Questions of social theory: scientific almanac. Vol. 12. Russia as a civilization of the future, pp. 17-120. [In Russian]
Tishkov V. A., Barabash R. E., Stepanov V. V. 2017. “Identity and life strategies of youth in Russia”. Sociological studies, no. 8, pp. 81-87. [In Russian]
Yakovets Yu. V. 2016. Eurasian civilization: historical roots, stages of development, revival strategy. Scientific report. Moscow: MISK.72 p. [In Russian]
Atamanova I. V., Kozlova N. V., Bogomaz S. A., Zalevsky V. G., Neyaskin Y. Y. V. 2018. “Specificity of personality — environment interaction on the example of students from three Russian cities”. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta, vol. 41, pр. 90-105.
Eisenstadt S. N. 1966. Modernization: Protest and Change. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. 166 pp.
Eisenstadt S. N. 2002. Some Observations on Multiple Modernities. Reflections on Multiple Modernities: European, Chinese and Other Interpretations [Papers Presented at a Multiple Modernities Conference, Held May 20-21, 2001 in Berlin]. Edited by D. Sachsenmaier. Leiden; Boston: Brill. 314 p.
Gafiatullina N. X., Lubech N. P., Samygin S. I. 2016. The Social Health of Russian Youth in the Era of Globalization. Moscow: RUSYNS. 235 p.
Inozemtsev V. 2016. “Russia’s economic modernization: the causes of a failure”. Notes de l’Ifri. Russie.Nei.Visions, no. 96. 26 р. https://www.ifri.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/rnv96_inozemtsev_uk_protege.pdf
Luhmann N. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. I.1. Gesellschaft als soziales System. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag. 1164 p.
Merry W. 2021. “The crisis of Russian modernization”. Open Democracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/crisis-of-russian-modernisation
Requies I. R., Rodrigues E. F., Pequeno J. M. G., Martinez R. A. 2016. “The construction of identity of young people in an interconnected society”. TEEM ‘16: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturalit, pp. 603-610. DOI:10.1145/3012430.3012581