The municipal elections in the Krasnoyarsk Territory in 2005-2020 as reflected in a socio-political analysis


2021, Vol. 5. № 2 (16)

The municipal elections in the Krasnoyarsk Territory in 2005-2020 as reflected in a socio-political analysis

For citation: Zlotkovskij V. I. 2021. “The municipal elections in the Krasnoyarsk Territory in 2005-2020 as reflected in a socio-political analysis”. Siberian Socium, vol. 5, no. 2 (16), pp. 78-91. DOI: 10.21684/2587-8484-2021-5-2-78-91

About the author:

Vladimir I. Zlotkovskij, Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Research Associate, Krasnoyarsk branch of the Academy of Labor and Social Relations (Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation);


The relevance of the research topic is due to the important role that local self-government bodies play in people’s lives: according to experts, 70-80% of everyday life issues that concern most people on a daily basis are solved at the local level. Therefore, the search for an optimal model of organizing the local self-government and relationships between local and regional authorities are still urgent tasks for our country. The purpose of this article is to trace how the implemented models of the organization of local self-government, which provide for indirect elections of heads of local self-government, affect the formation of local authorities and whether it was possible to bring the municipal authorities closer to the population. This goal is realized by analyzing the results of four municipal elections in the Krasnoyarsk Territory held in 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2020. The 3rd model of the organization of local self-government is already applied for the specified time. The methods used include a sociological survey of the population and the analysis of electoral statistics and mass media. The results allowed making the following conclusions. First off all, a system of government has been created at the municipal level, characterized by stability, continuity, and manageability, in which the United Russia party plays a dominant role. At the same time, the results of the last election highlighted the shortcomings of this system. Secondly, the transition to indirect elections of heads of municipalities did not lead to the creation of an effective mechanism for selecting the most worthy local leaders. Third, the steadily declining electoral activity of citizens in municipal elections: 62.4% (2005); 39.6% (2010); 29.6% (2015); 24.6% (2020), and the number of supporters of the “party of power” reduce the legitimacy of local governments. Fourthly, citizens are beginning to place responsibility for the situation on the ground on regional authorities.


  1. Barzilov S. 2003. “Electoral mobilization and regional party building”. Svobodnaya mysl — XXI, no. 10 (1536), pp. 23-32. [In Russian]

  2. Vasilyev V. I. 2015. “Local self-governance on the road to centralization and reduction of electability”. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no. 9, pp. 149-161. [In Russian]

  3. RF Ministry of Justice. “Report on the state of local self-government and the activities of the Russian Ministry of Justice on the development of its legal and organizational foundations in 2016”. Accessed 17 December 2017. [In Russian]

  4. Drobotenko I. 2010. “Foreign models of local self-government: experience for Russia ”. Vlast, no. 1, pp. 119-122. [In Russian]

  5. Emintseva Yu. A. 2016. “Institute of municipal elections in the works of Russian legal scholars”. NovaUm.Ru, no. 4, pp. 146-148. [In Russian]

  6. Zlotkovskiy V. I., Tselebrovskiy S. A. 2015. “The results of 2005-2020 municipal elections in the Krasnoyarsk Territory: sociological and political analysis”. Nauka Krasnoyarya, no. 6 (23), pp. 16-28. [In Russian]

  7. Izhokin A. N. 2016. “To the problem of the election of the head of the municipal entity”. Vestnik voronezhskogo instituta ekonomiki i sotsialnogo upravleniya, no. 1, pp. 62-66. [In Russian]

  8. Association Council of Municipal Formations of Khabarovsk Territory. 2015. Informational Bulletin of Local Self-Government, no. 2 (302). [In Russian]

  9. Klyuchko T. Yu. 2016. “Topical problems to the issue of direct elections of heads of municipalities”. Prioritetnye nauchnye napravleniya: ot teorii k praktike, no. 31, pp. 144-148. [In Russian]

  10. Konysheva E. G. 2015. “Local self-government and state administration: old problems, new solutions”. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava, no. 4 (53), pp. 114-118. [In Russian]

  11. Kynev A. V. 2015. “Intra-party democracy and state interference in party activity: Russian case”. Politiya, no. 2 (77), pp. 110-127. [In Russian]

  12. Maykova E. Yu., Simonova E. V. 2017. “A competitive model of the election of the head of local government in modern Russian municipal practice: advantages and disadvantages”. Vlast, no. 8, pp. 83-89. [In Russian]

  13. Nezhenets O. V. 2018. “On the problem of electing the head of the municipal formation by ‘competitive method’”. Epomen, no. 21, pp. 118-125. [In Russian]

  14. Nigmetzyanov T. I. 2016. “Municipal elections in Kostroma on the unified day of voting on September 13, 2015: electoral system and electoral process”. Vestnik KGU im. N. A. Nekrasova, no. 2, pp. 236-239. [In Russian]

  15. Krasnaya Vesna. “The resignation of heads of districts in Krasnoyarsk Krai was linked to the elections of 2020”. [In Russian]

  16. Krasnoyarsk Territory Election Commission Official Website.

  17. Ross K. 2008. “Municipal elections and electoral authoritarianism in Russia”. Politicheskaya nauka, no. 3, pp. 111-125. [In Russian]

  18. Shaposhnikova E. A. 2013. “Trends in the development of the electoral system of party lists at the municipal level in modern Russia (the case of municipalities of the Ryazan region)”. Vestnik MGOU, no. 1. [In Russian]

  19. Shchepotyev A. M. 2016. “New stage of municipal elections: democracy without local elections”. Vestnik SUrGU, no. 1 (11), pp. 89-93. [In Russian]

  20. Yusubov E. S. 2015. “Electoral systems in municipal elections: theory and practice of application”. Rossiyskoe pravo. Obrazovanie. Nauka. Praktika, no. 4, pp. 44-49. [In Russian]