Ethno-cultural neo-traditionalism as a resource of identity formation in the contemporary social and cultural transformations

Release:

2019, Vol. 3. №3

Title: 
Ethno-cultural neo-traditionalism as a resource of identity formation in the contemporary social and cultural transformations


For citation: Popkov Yu. V., Tiugashev E. A. 2019. “Ethno-cultural neo-traditionalism as a resource of identity formation in the contemporary social and cultural transformations”. Siberian Socium, vol. 3, no 3, pp. 53-64. DOI: 10.21684/2587-8484-2019-3-3-53-64

About the authors:

Yuriy V. Popkov, Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Chief Research Associate, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation); eLibrary AuthorID, ORCID, yuripopkov54@mail.ru

Evgeny A. Tyugashev, Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, Senior Research Associate, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation); eLibrary AuthorID, ORCID, Scopus AuthorID, filosof10@yandex.ru

Abstract:

This article aims to explain ethnocultural neo-traditionalism as a tool for the formation of ethnic and national identity and for identification of possible interconnection and synergy of these types of identity. The authors interpret ethno-cultural neo-traditionalism and identity problems as the global manifestation of ambiguous consequences of the contemporary socio-cultural transformations. They argue for treating it as a resource for the formation of ethnic and national identity, analyzing the problems and contradictions arising in this case. The potential possibilities of the proposed conceptual scheme are illustrated by two illustrative cases: Breton (Celtic people in France) and Selkup (Siberian people in Russia). In order to achieve this goal, besides the case study, the authors have used sociocultural approach in its authorial interpretation, which allows considering ethnocultural neo-traditionalism, first, as an inter-cultural phenomenon — the effect of interaction between different ethnocultures — and second, as an integrative policy that consolidates the potential of the ethnos in synchrony and diachrony. The analysis of Breton neo-traditionalism from the abovementioned positions allowed to reveal such features as participation in the Breton cultural movement of authentic bearers of tradition, its transmission to new generations through direct immersion in a living tradition, participation in the movement of families and its mass character, absence of borders between spectators and performers, accumulation of various modifications and local variations of cultures, enrichment of tradition with modern elements and experimentation, urban localization of holidays, formation of cultural industry, and organization of international cultural festivals, inclusive of various social and cultural practices. Such experience, presented in the Selkup cultural movement, forms and confirms a positive ethnic identity with the assistance of the state. Cultural expansion and international recognition of ethnocultural non-traditionalism practices remove the problem of local ethno-political ambitions and strengthen national identity as a prerequisite for the development of ethnic identity. Thus, the analysis shows the possibilities of cooperation, synergy of national and ethnic identities based on the implementation of the strategy of ethno-cultural non-traditionalism.

References:

  1. Angzhanova L. V. 2012. “Ethnic non-traditionalism in the conditions of socio-cultural transformations”. World of Science, Culture of Education, no 6, pp. 438-440. [In Russian]
  2. Borisova I. Z. 2017. “Historical and sociolinguistic foundations of Breton identity”. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta (=Bulletin of Bashkir University), no 1, pp. 184-189. [In Russian]
  3. Gromov M. N. 2003. “Problems of the future of Russia: modernization or restoration”. Proceedings of the Research Conference on the 300th anniversary of Lodeinoe Pole “Ladoga and the Russian North: history, traditions, and modernity” (8-12 July 2002), pp.  55-60. Moscow: Russian Humanistic Society. [In Russian]
  4. Semenenko I. S. (ed.). 2017. Identity: personality, society, politics. Encyclopedia. Moscow: Ves mir. [In Russian]
  5. Kovalska E. Kh. A. S. 2016. “Historical and sociolinguistic foundations of Breton identity”. Proceedings of International Research Conference “Science as a driving force of anti-crisis: innovative transformations, priority directions and trends of development of fundamental and applied scientific research” (15-16 January, Saint Petersburg), pp. 120-124. Saint Petersburg: KULT-INFORM-PRESS. [In Russian]
  6. Kryukov V. A. 2017. “‘Raznotsvetnaya’ economy”. ECO, no 10, pp. 2-4. DOI: 10.30680/ECO0131-7652-2017-10-2-4 [In Russian]
  7. Losev A. F. 2000. History of Ancient Aesthetics. Classical Works. Kharkiv; Moscow: Folio: AST. [In Russian]
  8. Lubart M. K. 2013. “‘Fez-noz’ holiday as a phenomenon in the modern Breton culture”. In: Martynova M. Yu. (ed.). Essays on European Identity and Multiculturalism. Pp. 323-358. Moscow: IEA RAN. [In Russian]
  9. Madiukova S. A., Popkov Yu. V. 2011. Phenomenon of Sociocultural Neo-Traditionalism. Saint Petersburg: Aletea. [In Russian]
  10. Morgan L. G. 1983. League of Hodenosauni, or Iroquois. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian]
  11. Nikolaeva E. G. 2004. “Neo-traditionalism in the culture of everyday life: Russian version of the late 20th century”. Cand. Sci. (Cult.) diss. abstract. Moscow. [In Russian]
  12. Novikova O. S. 2016. “Features of social self-identification in the transition from traditional to modern society (the case of Japan)”. Cand. Sci. (Philos.) diss. Novosibirsk. [In Russian]
  13. Pivneva E. A. 2011. “‘We are one, but we are all different’: about obscene eels, classifications, and identities”. Ural Historical Journal, no 2, pp. 57-62. [In Russian]
  14. Popkov Yu. V., Tyugashev E. A. 2015. “Phenomenon of ethno-cultural neo-traditionalism”. In: Derevyanko A. P., Tishkova V. A. (eds.). Traditions and Innovations in History and Culture. Pp. 235-243. Moscow: IEA. [In Russian]
  15. Rykhtik M. I., Zhernovaya O. R. 2011. “Influence of the ethnic factor on the cultural and linguistic identity of the Welsh in contemporary English jokes and anecdotes”. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice, no 2 (8) in 3 parts, part 1, pp. 151-157. [In Russian]
  16. Semenenko I. S. 2016. “Identity policy and identity in politics: ethno-national perspectives, European context”. Policy. Political Studies, no 4, pp. 8-28. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2016.04.03 [In Russian]
  17. Sisauri V. I. 2008. Ceremonial music of China and Japan. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University. [In Russian]
  18. Tishkov V. A. 2013. Russian People: History and Meaning of the National Consciousness. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian]
  19. Tuchkova N. V. 2015. “Fiction and folklore as ethnically consolidating factors stimulating the growth of ethnic identity (based on the materials of the Parabel District of the Tomsk Region”. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology, no 2, pp. 102-111. [In Russian]
  20. U Gen-Ir. 2012. “Traditional music of the Far East (China, Korea, Japan): Historical and theoretical analysis”. Dr. Sci. (Art Studies) diss. abstract. Saint Petersburg. [In Russian]
  21. RF President Decree of 19 December 2012 No 1666 (as of 6 December 2018) “On the Strategy of the State National Policy of the Russian Federation until 2025”. [In Russian]
  22. Huntington S. 2008. Who Are We? Challenges of American National Identity. Translated by A. Bashkirov. Moscow: AST: AST MOSCOW. [In Russian]
  23. Sztompka P. 2005. Sociology. Analysis of Contemporary Society. Moscow: Logos. [In Russian]
  24. Shubin, Yu. A. 2011. “Contemporary transformations of ethno-cultural identity: universal tendencies and Russian specificity”. Cand. SCi. (Cult.) diss. abstract. Moscow. [In Russian]
  25. Jakson R. L. II, Hogg M. A. (ed.). 2010. Encyclopedia of Identity. SAGE Publications, Inc. DOI: 10.4135/9781412979306
  26. Scwartz S., Luyckx K., Vignoles V. (eds.). 2011. Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. Springer.