The trust of migrants towards recipient society in the context of social security in the Russian border regions of Russia

Release:

2019, Vol. 3. №2

Title: 
The trust of migrants towards recipient society in the context of social security in the Russian border regions of Russia


For citation: Maximova S. G., Omelchenko D. A., Noyanzina O. E. 2019. “The trust of migrants towards recipient society in the context of social security in the Russian border regions of Russia”. Siberian Socium, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 18-34. DOI: 10.21684/2587-8484-2019-3-2-18-34

About the authors:

Svetlana G. Maksimova, Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Professor, Head of the Department of Psychology of Communication and Psychotechnologies, Altai State University (Barnaul, Russian Federation); eLibrary AuthorID, ORCID, Web of Science ResearcherID, Scopus AuthorID, svet-maximova@yandex.ru

Daria A. Omelchenko, Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor, Department of Psychology of Communication and Psychotechnologies, Altai State University (Barnaul, Russian Federation); eLibrary AuthorID, ORCID, Web of Science ResearcherID, Scopus AuthorID, daria.omelchenko@mail.ru

Oksana E. Noyanzina, Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor, Department of Psychology of Communication and Psychotechnologies, Altai State University (Barnaul, Russian Federation); eLibrary AuthorID, ORCID, Web of Science ResearcherID, Scopus AuthorID, noe@list.ru

Abstract:

International migration is an important vehicle for achieving geopolitical, economic, and demographic interests, strongly embedded into the Russian society. Orientation of the Russian state on the support of migrants either highly motivated to integrate or at least “obedient” and ready to follow legal and socio-cultural norms raises a number of questions. How prepared is the Russian society to digest migration flows and accept new members? How do migrants perceive the Russian reality? What kinds of relationships do they seek to establish with local population? To what extent do they rely on the state and public systems? This article presents the results of formalized interviews with migrants in seven Russian border regions: the Altai Territory (n=319), Orenburg Region (n=100), Murmansk Region (n=100), Pskov Region (n=100), Republic of Altai (n=20), Republic of Dagestan (n=51), and Rostov Region (n=94). Guided by the integrative theoretical-methodological approach (including contemporary concepts of migration and trust) and using path analysis, the authors suggest a complex model, where the migrants’ trust is linked with life stance and social-psychological determinants. Among the latter, a crucial role belongs to the perceived discrimination and attitudes of the local population, moderated by perception of security. The authors show that the trust is an important factor, determining the level of satisfaction with different aspects of the life in Russia.

References:

  1. Barsukova S. Yu. 2001. “Enforceable trust in the world of social networks”. Polis. Political Studies, no 2, pp. 52-60. [In Russian]
  2. Brednikova O., Pachenkov O. 2002. “Ethnicity of the ‘ethnical economics’ and social networks of migrants”. Economic Sociology, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 74-81. DOI 10.17323/1726-3247-2002-2-74-81 [In Russian]
  3. Gudkov L. D. 2012. “‘Trust’ in Russia: meaning, functions, structure”. The Russian Public Opinion Herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions, no 2 (112), pp. 8-47. [In Russian]
  4. Immigration to Russia: good or harmful? Accessed on 10 March 2019. https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=9487 [In Russian]
  5. Kozyreva P. M., Smirnov A. I. 2010. “Trust and its role in the consolidation of Russian society”. In: Gorshkov M. K. (ed.). Social Factors of Consolidation of the Russian Society: Sociological Dimension, pp. 160-199. New Chronograph. [In Russian]
  6. Kozyreva P. M. 2009. “Interpersonal trust in the context of social capital formation”. Sociological Studies, no 1, pp. 43-54. [In Russian]
  7. Mastikova N. S. 2016. “Ethnic tension in Russia and Europe (according to the European Social Survey, 2012)”. Sociological Journal, vol. 22, no 1, pp. 95-113. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2016.22.1.3921 [In Russian]
  8. Materials of the Levada-Center for the tag “migrants”. Accessed on 10 March 2019. http://www.levada.ru/tag/migranty/ [In Russian]
  9. Mukomel V. I., Ryzhova S. V. 2017. “Trust and distrust in interethnic relations”. Sociological Studies, no 1, pp. 37-46. [In Russian]
  10. Mukomel V. I. 2014. “Xenophobia in the context of culture of trust”. Universe of Russia, vol. 23, no 1, pp. 137-166. [In Russian]
  11. Omelchenko D. A., Maximova S. G., Noyanzina O. E. 2018. “Generalized trust in Russian border regions as indicator of social safety”. Society and Security Insights, vol. 1, no 2, pp. 11-28. DOI: 10.14258/ssi(2018)2-01 [In Russian]
  12. Omelchenko D. A., Maximova S. G., Voronina E. V. 2016. “Institutional trust as a factor of national unity and social cohesion in Russia”. Sotsial’naya integratsiya i razvitie etnokul’tur v evraziiskom prostranstve, no 4-1, pp. 155-162. [In Russian]
  13. Attitudes towards migrants. Who is disturbed by migrants and for what reasons? Accessed on 10 March 2019. https://fom.ru/Nastroeniya/14111 [In Russian]
  14. Ryzhova S. V. 2016. “Trust and ethnic tolerance under conditions of social change”. Sociological Journal, vol. 22, no 1, pp. 72-94. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2016.22.1.3920 [In Russian]
  15. Skrypkina T. P. 1998. “Trust as a social psychological phenomenon”. Dr. Sci. (Psych.) diss. Rostov State Pedagogical University. [In Russian]
  16. Stepanenko V. P. 2004. “Social capital in the sociological perspective: theretical and methodological aspects of research”. Sotsiologiya: Teoriya, Metody, Marketing, no 2, pp. 24-41. [In Russian]
  17. Tatarko A. N., Lebedeva N. M. 2008. “The study of social axioms: their structure and interrelations with socio-economic predispositions of Russians”. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, vol. 5, no 4, pp. 135-143. [In Russian]
  18. Tikhonova N. E. 2004. “Social capital as a factor of inequality”. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, no 4, pp. 24-35. [In Russian]
  19. Fofanova K. V., Sychev A. A., Borisov D. M. 2014. “Factors of interethnic consolidation in the context of migration processes”. Regionology, no 4 (89), pp. 130-140. [In Russian]
  20. Yasin E. G. 2007. “Modernization and society”. Proceedings of the 8th International Research Conference “Modernization of Economics and Public Development” (3-5 April 2007, Moscow). Moscow: HSE Publishing House. [In Russian]
  21. Berry J. W. 2005. “Acculturation: living successfully in two cultures”. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, vol. 29, no 6, pp. 697-712. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.013
  22. Bradford B., Sargeant E., Murphy T., Jackson J. 2017. “A leap of faith? Trust in the police among migrants in England and Wales”. British Journal of Criminology, vol. 57, no 2, pp. 381-401.
  23. Cohen R. 2008. Global Diasporas: An Introduction. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203928943
  24. Dinesen P. T. 2012. “Does generalized (dis)trust travel? Examining the impact of cultural heritage and destination-country environment on trust of immigrants”. Political Psychology, vol. 33, no 4, pp. 495-511. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00886.x
  25. Dinesen P. T. 2011. “Where you come from or where you live? Examining the cultural and institutional explanation of generalized trust using migration as a natural experiment”. European Sociological Review, vol. 29, no 1, pp. 114-128. DOI: 10.1093/esr/jcr044
  26. Fernández R. 2011. “Does culture matter?”. In: Benhabib J., Jackson M.O., Bisin A. (eds.). Handbook of Social Economic, vol. 1A, pp. xvii-xxi.
  27. Giddens A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford University Press.
  28. Helliwell J. F., Wang S., Xu J. 2016. “How durable are social norms? Immigrant trust and generosity in 132 countries”. Social Indicators Research, vol. 128, no 1, pp. 201-219. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-015-1026-2
  29. Maxwell R. 2010. “Trust in government among British Muslims: the importance of migration status”. Political Behavior, vol. 32, no 1, pp. 89-109. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-009-9093-1
  30. Michelson M. R. 2003. “The corrosive effect of acculturation: how Mexican Americans lose political trust”. Social Science Quarterly, vol. 84, no 4, pp. 918-933. DOI: 10.1046/j.0038-4941.2003.08404017.x
  31. Nannestad P., Svendsen G. T., Dinesen P. T., Sønderskov K. M. 2014. “Do institutions or culture determine the level of social trust? The natural experiment of migration from non-western to western countries”. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 40, no 4, pp. 544-565. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2013.830499
  32. Röder A., Mühlau P. 2012. “Low expectations or different evaluations: what explains immigrants’ high levels of trust in host-country institutions?” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 38, no 5, pp. 777-792. DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2012.667986
  33. Stolle D., Soroka S., Johnston R. 2008. “When does diversity erode trust? Neighborhood diversity, interpersonal trust and the mediating effect of social interactions”. Political Studies, vol. 56, no 1, pp. 57-75. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00717.x
  34. Sturgis P., Brunton-Smith I., Kuha J., Jackson J. 2014. “Ethnic diversity, segregation and the social cohesion of neighbourhoods in London”. Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 37, no 8, pp. 1286-1309. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2013.831932
  35. Tam T., Hewstone M., Kenworthy J., Cairns E. 2009. “Intergroup trust in Northern Ireland”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 35, no 1, pp. 45-59. DOI: 10.1177/0146167208325004
  36. Uslaner E. M. 2002. The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614934
  37. Uslaner E. M. 2008. “Trust as a moral value”. In: Castiglione D., van Deth J.W., Wolled G. (eds.). The Handbook of Social Capital, pp. 101-121. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  38. Weaver C. N. 2003. “Confidence of Mexican Americans in major institutions in the United States”. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, vol. 25, no 4, pp. 501-512. DOI: 10.1177/0739986303258128
  39. Wenzel J. P. 2006. “Acculturation effects on trust in national and local government among Mexican Americans”. Social Science Quarterly, vol. 87, no 5, pp. 1073-1087. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00416.x