Clarifying management indicators of the global programme for sustainable urban development


2019, Vol. 3. №1

Clarifying management indicators of the global programme for sustainable urban development

For citation: Kostko N. A. 2019. “Clarifying management indicators of the global programme for sustainable urban development”. Siberian Socium, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 8-17. DOI: 10.21684/2587-8484-2019-3-1-8-17

About the author:

Natalya A. Kostko, Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Professor, Department of General and Economical Sociology, University of Tyumen (Tyumen, Russian Federation);


At present, there is an evident institutionalization of the concept of sustainable development, which has also been adopted for cities. Russia has joined the UN basic documents on cities within the framework of sustainable development. However, the management of a contemporary Russian city is determined by a unified set of indicators as a municipality, which is not able to assess the nature and specificity of urban processes and phenomena in their systemic manifestation. Modernity is characterized by the increased urbanization, complexity of social processes and phenomena in society, and rising turbulence and uncertainty in the development of social systems. The ambiguity of this concept as a flow, as a linear, split, or transitive idea, actualizes the problem of determining the content of its development management. This article is of theoretical and methodological nature, and it uses a systematic approach. It continues the author’s previous works on argumentation, methodological validity, and application of the concept of social space of the city as a target reference point in the management practice of the city development. The author suggests that the property of interconnectedness and interdependence of the social space of the city with the citizens allows using it as an integral indicator of the contribution of the latter to the development. The characteristics of indices on the state of the social space of the city are specified. The importance of application of social space, identity, social activity of citizens, and its value-normative bases in practice of administrative goal-setting of development of the city, taking into account the existing international and Russian legal documents, is shown. The paper presents the logic of the empirical stage of research of the social space of the city and its indices.


  1. Amin E., Trift N. 2002. “Citites. Remaining the Urban”. Logos, no 3-4. [In Russian]
  2. Brundtland G. H. 1989. Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Future. Edited by S. A. Evteev and R. A. Perelet. Moscow: Progress. [In Russian]
  3. Bourdieu P. 1993. Sociology of Politics. Translated from French. Compiled, edited, and introduction by N. A. Shmatko. Moscow: Socio-Logos. [In Russian]
  4. Giddens E. 1994. “Fate, Risk and Security”. Translated by S. P. Bankovskaya. THESIS, vol. 5, pp. 107-134. [In Russian]
  5. UN Economic and Social Council. 2017. “Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals. Report of the Secretary-General”. 11 May. [In Russian]
  6. Castells M. 2000. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Translated from English. Edited by O. I. Shkaratan. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. [In Russian]
  7. Kostko N. A. 2016. “Social space of the city: theoretical basis of research and application in the practice of municipal administration”. In: Yasin E. G. (ed.). 16th April International Research Conference on the Development of Economy and Society in 4 vols. Vol. 2, pp. 143-150. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. [In Russian]
  8. Kostko N. A., Kirichuk S. M. 2017. “The social construction of space through the study of territorial identity of the citizens using the method of mental maps”. News from Higher Educational Institutions. Sociology. Economics. Politics, no 4, pp. 7-12. [In Russian]
  9. Luhmann N. 1999. “Theory of society”. In: Filippov A. F. (ed.). Theory of Society, pp. 196-235. Translated from German and English. Moscow: KANON-press-Ts, Kuchkovo pole. [In Russian]
  10. UN. 2017. “New Urban Agenda”. Adopted 20 October 2016 at the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (Habitat III), Quito. Approved at the 68th plenary meeting of the United Nations General Assembly on 23 December 2016. [In Russian]
  11. Perelet R. A. 2009. “System management of transition to sustainable development”. Proceedings of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 42, pp. 78-103. [In Russian]
  12. UN. “The Sustainable Development Agenda”. Accessed 1 March 2018. [In Russian]
  13. Stradze A. E. 2013. “Social activity: positioning in the social space”. Theory and Practice of Social Development, no 5, pp. 96-99. [In Russian]
  14. Torbenko A. M. 2015. “Linear city models: overview and typology”. Journal of the New Economic Association, no 1 (25), pp. 12-38. [In Russian]
  15. SKOLKOVO. 2016. Management of Spatial and Economic Development of the City: Hidden Resources. City sphere. Moscow urban forum. Moscow.
  16. RF Federal Law of 6 October 2003 No 131-FZ (as of 6 February 2019) “On general principles of organization of local self-government in the Russian Federation”. [In Russian]
  17. RF Federal Law of 28 June 2014 No 172-FZ “On strategic planning in the Russian Federation”. [In Russian]
  18. Harvey D. 2008. “Right to the city”. Logos, no 3, pp. 80-95. Accessed 18 April 2018. [In Russian]
  19. UN. 2016. Habitat III: Zero Draft of the New Urban Agenda. 6 May. Accessed 1 March 2018. [In Russian]
  20. UN-GGIM Academic Network Forum Report of 31 July 2017 “Secure Land Rights and Smart Cities — Making It Work for Sustainable Development”. 7th Session of the United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management. Accessed 1 March 2018.
  21. UN. 2017. Report on the Forty-Eighth Session of the Statistical Commission (7-10 March). New York. URL: