Value attitudes in the context of the social capital of the regional population


2018, Vol. 2. №4

Value attitudes in the context of the social capital of the regional population

For citation: Guzhavina T. A., Vorobyova I. N. 2018. “Value attitudes in the context of the social capital of the regional population”. Siberian Socium, vol. 2, no 4, pp. 20-29. DOI: 10.21684/2587-8484-2018-2-4-20-29

About the authors:

Tatyana A. Guzhavina, Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher, Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Vologda, Russian Federation); ORCID: 0000-0003-0636-7690; Web of Science ResearcherID: R-4871-2017;

Irina N. Vorobyova, Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor,  Cherepovets State University (Cherepovets, Russian Federation);


Nowadays, the researchers studying social changes draw their attention towards the social capital. Its structural components cause particular interest — in particular, the personal values. They form social relations, and they are especially important for social and economic development (in addition to cultural norms and trust). Besides, these values allow measuring the social capital. This article aims to show the role and importance of value systems in the construction of the social capital’s indicator model. The study was conducted by specialists of the Vologda Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences (VolSC RAS) in the Vologda Region. They identified different types of social capital carriers, as well as the differences in their values. All respondents were divided into groups based on their preferences. Some were carriers of paternalistic attitudes, which led them towards the desire for stability and the fear of change. This group could potentially resist any changes. The other group included active people, who were a “catalyst” for changing and introducing anything new. They contributed to the design of new technologies, introduction of management decisions in organizations, and the socio-economic development of the region. Consequently, the block of values is a significant indicator for measuring social capital and, thus, it is necessary for a comprehensive study of the country’s and region’s social capital. Such studies have already proved their worth, and they can be especially useful for the managerial staff, including practitioners, researchers, as well as in the educational sphere. The research methodology, tested in two regions of the North-Western Federal District, has proved its validity and can be used to obtain and analyze data in other regions of the country. This technique is also applicable in the management of corporations and organizations.


  1. Afanasyev D. V., Guzhavina T. A., Mekhova A. A. 2016. “Social capital in the region: on the issue of measuring and building an indicator model”. Ekonomicheskiye i sotsial’nyye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz, no 6 (48), pp. 110-125. [In Russian]
  2. Vorobyova I. N., Mekhova A. A. 2012. “Theoretical and methodological problems of measuring social capital”. In: Sotsial’nyy kapital kak resurs modernizatsii v regione: problemy formirovaniya i izmereniya. Vol. 1, pp. 103-109. [In Russian]
  3. Guzhavina T. A., Vorobyova I. N. 2017. “Application of factor analysis in measuring social capital”. Sotsial’noye prostranstvo, no 4. [In Russian]
  4. Nauchnyy seminar. 2008. “Cultural values and social capital: measurement, dynamics, impact on the socio-economic development of Russia”. 26 November. [In Russian]
  5. Lebedeva N. M., Tatarko A. N. 2007. Values of Culture and the Development of Society. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. [In Russian]
  6. Menyashev R. Sh., Polishchuk L. I. 2011. “The economic outcome of the social capital: what does the Russian data say?”. In: Yasin E. G. (ed.). XI Mezhdunarodnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya po problemam razvitiya ekonomiki i obshchestva: in 3 vols. Vol. 2, pp. 159-170. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. [In Russian]
  7. Ria Reyting. “Ranking of Russian regions by the quality of life — 2016”. [In Russian]
  8. Fukuyama F. 2004. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Translated from English. Moscow: AST: Ermak. [In Russian]
  9. Yanitskiy O. N. 2016. “Adaptation as an eternal problem”. Vlast, no 4, pp. 68-74. [In Russian]
  10. Baumol W. 1990. “Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive”. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, no 5, part 1, pp. 893-921.
  11. Bourdieu P. 1986. “The forms of capital”. In: Richardson J. G. (ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, pp. 241-258. New York: Greenwood Press.
  12. Dakhli M., de Clercq D. 2004. “Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study”. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, vol. 16. DOI: 10.1080/08985620410001677835
  13. Fukuyama F. 2000. “Social capital and civil society”. IMF Working Paper WP/00/74. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund.
  14. Inglehart R. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 
  15. Munene J. C., Schwartz S. H., Kibanja G. 2005. Escaping from Behavioral Poverty in Uganda. The Role of Culture and Social Capital. Kampala. 
  16. Putnam R., Helliwell J. 1995. “Economic growth and social capital in Italy”. Eastern Economic Journal, no 21 (3), рp. 295-307. 
  17. Putnam R. D. 2001. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Touchstone Books by Simon and Schuster.
  18. Woolcock М. 2003. Measuring Social Capital: An Integrated Questionnaire. Washington D.C.: WorldBank.