The Industrial Growth Path of the Tyumen Region in the Context of the History of Its Social-Economic Embeddedness

Release:

2017, Vol. 1. №2

Title: 
The Industrial Growth Path of the Tyumen Region in the Context of the History of Its Social-Economic Embeddedness


For citation: Andrianova E. V., Davydenko V. A., Romashkina G. F. 2017. “The Industrial Growth Path of the Tyumen Region in the Context of the History of Its Social-Economic Embeddedness”. Siberian Socium, vol. 1, no 2, pp. 12-46. DOI: 10.21684/2587-8484-2017-1-2-12-46

About the authors:

Elena V. Andrianova, Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Head of the Department of General and Economic Sociology, University of Tyumen; Senior Researcher, West-Siberian Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Tyumen, Russian Federation); eLibrary AuthorID, ORCID, Web of Science ResearcherID, e.v.andrianova@utmn.ru

Vladimir A. Davydenko, Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor, University of Tyumen; vlad_davidenko@mail.ru

Gulnara F. Romashkina, Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor, University of Tyumen; g.f.romashkina@utmn.ru

Abstract:

This article presents an analysis of academic sources; theoretical approaches and methodologies of researching processes of new industrialization and adjacent social-cultural space as its core; construction of the technique for determining the current positions of macro-, meso- and microactors, revealing their interests; examples of real practices and dominating lines of economical behaviour in the context of industrial growth path of the Tyumen Region. The authors provide empirical, theoretical and methodological studies of the new industrialization, its possibilities and limitations on the example of the Tyumen Region. They disclose the problems and contradictions of the sociocultural regional space, taken in the historical, sociocultural and socioeconomic contexts. This paper emphasises the fact that institutions and technologies are associated with formal and informal practices embodying social norms, implicit knowledge, which reproduce (both politically and socially) the entire spectrum of structured interactions between groups of different status and the regional elites. The authors consider the phenomenon of increasing return on investment in the framework of this study as the most important characteristic of modern societal and technical-technological processes. They see the introduction of new technologies and the innovative activity of elites through the prism of both their direct and indirect influence on the industrial trajectory of the growth of the Tyumen Region. The latter is represented from the historical, socioeconomic, structural, cultural, political and cognitive standpoints by the types of entrenched leading representatives of status groups. The growth can also be viewed as the reproduction of their actions, embodied in terms of their new incentives (motives), of old and new social values.

References:

  1. Amosov A. 2014. “Ob ekonomicheskom mekhanizme novogo industrial’nogo razvitiya” [On the Economic Mechanism of The New Industrial Development]. Ekonomist, no 2, pp. 3-12.
  2. Artur B. 2005. “Vozrastayushchaya otdacha i dva mira biznesa” [Increasing Returns and Two Worlds of Business]. Ekonomicheskiy vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, vol. 3, no 4, pp. 7.
  3. Balashov A., Martyanova Ya. 2015. “Reindustrializatsiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki i razvitie oboronno-promyshlennogo kompleksa” [Reindustrialization of the Russian Economy and Development of the Defence Industry Complex]. Voprosy ekonomiki, no 9, pp. 31-44.
  4. Belyaeva L. A. 2013. “Kul’turnyy i sotsial’nyy kapital i napryazhennost’ sotsial’nogo prostranstva Rossii” [Cultural and Social Capital and the Tension of the Social Space of Russia]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no 5, pp, 51-64. 
  5. Bodrunov S. D., Grinberg R. S., Sorokin D. E. 2013. “Reindustrializatsiya rossiyskoy ekonomiki: imperativy, potentsial, riski” [Reindustrialization of the Russian Economy: Imperatives, Potential, Risks]. Ekonomicheskoe vozrozhdenie Rossii, no 1, pp. 19-49.
  6. Byukenen Dzh. M. 1997. Sochineniya [Written Works], vol. 1. Translated from English; edited by P. M. Nureev et al. “Nobelevskie laureaty po ekonomike” series. Moscow: Taurus Al’fa; Fond ekonomicheskoy initsiativy.
  7. Vedomosti. 2011. “V. V. Putin provozglasil kurs na novuyu industrializatsiyu” [Vladimir Putin Proclaimed a Course towards the New Industrialization]. Vedomosti, 11 May. 
  8. Weber M. 1990. “Osnovnye sotsiologicheskie ponyatiya” [Basic Sociological Concepts]. In: Weber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya, pp. 602-603, 625-626. Moscow: Progress.
  9. Weber M. 2017. “Khozyaystvo i obshchestvo: ocherki ponimayushchey sotsiologii. Obshchnosti” [Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya, vol. 18, no 1, pp. 13-27.
  10. Weber M. [1972] 2016. Khozyaystvo i obshchestvo: ocherki ponimayushchey sotsiologii [Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie] in 4 vols. /translated from German; compiled, edited and introduction by L. G. Ionina. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck); Moscow: HSE Publishing House.
  11. Volchik V. V., Kot V. V. 2013. “Institutsional’nye izmeneniya v periferiynykh regionakh: rol’ grazhdanskikh institutov” [Institutional Changes in Peripheral Regions: The Role of Civil Institutions]. Terra Economicus, vol. 11, no 4, pp. 19.
  12. Territorial’nyy organ Federal’noy sluzhby gosudarstvennoy statistiki po Tyumenskoy oblasti. 2015. Demograficheskiy ezhegodnik (2011-2015): Stat. sb. [Demographic Year-Book (2011-2015): Statistical Collection] in 3 parts. Part 3. Tyumen.
  13. Dmitriev M. E. 2016. Analiz faktorov realizatsii dokumentov strategicheskogo planirovaniya verkhnego urovnya. Analiticheskiy doklad [Analysis of the Factors of Implementation of Documents of Strategic Planning of the Upper Level. Analytical Report]. St. Petersburg. Accessed on 28 December 2016. http://polit.ru/media/files/2016/12/27/Report-on-strategy.pdf
  14. Dobbin F. 2013. Formirovanie promyshlennoy politiki: Soedinennye Shtaty, Velikobritaniya i Frantsiya v period stanovleniya zheleznodorozhnoy otrasli [Formation of Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain and France in the Period of the Formation of the Railway Industry]. Translated from English by E. B. Golovlyanitsina; edited by V. V. Radaev. “Sotsial’naya teoriya” series. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. 
  15. Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug Economics Department. 2016. “Doklad o sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoy situatsii v Yamalo-Nenetskom avtonomnom okruge za 2015 god” [Report on the Socio-Economic Situation in the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District For 2015]. Salekhard, Accessed on 31 January 2017. http://de.gov.yanao.ru/ser%C2%ADyanao?id=69 
  16. Dubenetskiy Ya. N. 2014. “Reindustrializatsiya: prakticheskie shagi” [Reindustrialization: Practical Steps]. Mir novoy ekonomiki, no 2, pp. 13-20.
  17. Zubarevich N. 2014. “Chetyre Rossii otmenyayutsya” [Cancellation of Four Russias]. Novaya gazeta, 20 December; Novaya gazeta, Politika, no 144, 22 December.
  18. Zubarevich N. 2016. “Ekonomika: Ni deneg, ni svobody” [Economics: No Money Or Freedom]. Vedomosti, 29 December.
  19. Ivanter V. V., Komkov N. I. 2012. “Osnovnye polozheniya kontseptsii innovatsionnoy industrializatsii Rossii” [The Main Provisions of the Concept of Innovative Industrialization of Russia]. Problemy prognozirovaniya, no 5, pp. 3-12.
  20. Inozemtsev V. 2013. “Strategiya razvitiya: Vybor prioritetov” [Development Strategy: Priority Choice]. Vedomosti, 6 August.
  21. Inozemtsev V. 2013. “Strategiya razvitiya: Zhit’ za schet resursov” [Development Strategy: Living at the Expense of Resources]. Vedomosti, 7 August.
  22. Lenchuk E. B. (ed.). 2014. Institutsional’naya sreda “novoy industrializatsii” ekonomiki Rossii: sbornik [Institutional Environment of the “New Industrialization” of the Russian Economy: Collected Works]. Moscow: Institut ekonomiki RAN.
  23. Lapin N. I. 2015. “Aktual’nye teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty issledovaniy rossiyskoy modernizatsii” [Actual Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of the Studies of Russian Modernization]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no 1, pp. 5-10. 
  24. Lapin N. I. 2006. “Antroposotsietal’nyy podkhod” [Anthroposocial Approach]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii, vol. IX, no 3.
  25. Lapin N. I. 2005. “Antroposotsietal’nyy podkhod: metodologicheskie osnovaniya, sotsiologicheskie izmereniya” [Anthroposocial Approach: Methodological Grounds, Sociological Measurements]. Voprosy filosofii, no 2, pp. 17-29.
  26. Lapin N. I. 2014. “Problemy formirovaniya kontseptsii i chelovecheskikh izmereniy strategii poetapnoy modernizatsii Rossii i ee regionov” [Problems in the Formation of the Concept and Human Dimensions of the Strategy for the Gradual Modernization of Russia and Its Regions]. Sotsiologicheskir issledovaniya, no 7, pp. 8-19. 
  27. Lapin N. I., Belyaeva L. A. 2010. Programma i tipovoy instrumentariy “Sotsiokul’turnyy portret regiona Rossii” (Modifikatsiya — 2010) [Program and the Standard Toolkit “Sociocultural Portrait of the Russian Region” (Modification — 2010)]. Moscow: MFRAN.
  28. Lapin N. I. 2000. “Sotsiokul’turnyy podkhod i sotsietal’no-funktsional’nye struktury” [Sociocultural Approach and Societal Functional Structures]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no 7, pp. 3-12.
  29. Lenchuk E. B. 2014. “Rol’ ‘novoy industrializatsii’ v formirovanii innovatsionnoy ekonomiki Rossii” [The Role of the “New Industrialization” in the Formation of Russia’s Innovative Economy]. In: Lenchuk. E. B. (ed.). Institutsional’naya sreda “novoy industrializatsii” ekonomiki Rossii [Institutional Environment of the “New Industrialization” of the Russian Economy], pp. 12-43. Moscow: Institut ekonomiki RAN.
  30. Kommersant. 2017. “Ministr ekonomiki Maksim Oreshkin o starykh i novykh zadachakh ministerstva” [Minister of Economy, Maksim Oreshkin, On the Old and New Tasks of the Ministry]. Kommersant, 8 January.
  31. Ekspert Ural. 2007. “Odno ‘no’” [One “But”]. Ekspert Ural, 26 November. http://www.acexpert.ru/archive/44-307/odno-no.html
  32. Osnovnye itogi sotsial’no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Tyumenskoy oblasti (bez avtonomnykh okrugov) za 2015 god [The Main Results of Social and Economic Development of the Tyumen Region (Without Autonomous Okrugs) for 2015]. Accessed on 31 January 2017. http://admtyumen.ru/ogv_ru/finance/economics/results/more.htm?id=11356316@cmsArticle 
  33. Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug — Yugra Governor’s Report “O rezul’tatakh deyatel’nosti Pravitel’stva Khanty-Mansiyskogo avtonomnogo okruga — Yugry v 2015 godu” [On the Results of the Government of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug - Ugra In 2015]. Accessed on 31 January 2017. http://www.dumahmao.ru/povest/povest_5705(1)/07/33.pdf
  34. Polterovich V. M. 1997. “Krizis ekonomicheskoy teorii” [The Crisis of Economic Theory]. Report at the Research Workshop of Otdelenie ekonomiki i TsEMI RAN “Neizvestnaya ekonomika” [The Unknown Economy]. TsEMI RAN. http://www.nbrilev.ru/krizis_economic_theory_.htm
  35. Tyumen Region Governor’s, V. V. Yakushev, message to the Regional Duma. 2016. “O polozhenii del v oblasti i perspektivakh ee razvitiya” [On the State of Affairs in the Region and Prospects for Its Development]. https://gubernator.admtyumen.ru/governor_to/ru/interviews/messages.htm
  36. Radaev V. V. 2001. “Novyy institutsional’nyy podkhod: postroenie issledovatel’skoy skhemy” [A New Institutional Approach: Building a Research Scheme]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya: elektronnyy zhurnal, vol. 2, no 3, pp. 5-26.
  37. Valenteya S. D. (ed.). 2015. Reindustrializatsiya ekonomiki Rossii v usloviyakh novykh ugroz [Reindustrialization of the Russian Economy in the Face of New Threats], vol. 2. Nauch. doklady REU. Moscow: FGBOU VPO REU im. G. V. Plekhanova. 
  38. Tyumen Regional Duma. The official website. 2016. “Sergey Korepanov ob itogakh 2016-go i planakh na 2017 god: glavnaya zadacha Tyumenskoy oblasti — obespechenie usloviy rosta regional’noy ekonomiki i vypolnenie sotsial’nykh obyazatel’stv” [Sergey Korepanov on the Results of 2016 and Plans for 2017: The Main Task of the Tyumen Region Is to Ensure Conditions for the Growth of the Regional Economy and Fulfillment of Social Obligations]. 30 January. http://www.duma72.ru/ru/arena/new/news/609/47865/
  39. Novaya gazeta. 2010. “Sergey Semenovich. Vot on kakoy” [Sergey Semenovich. That’s What He Is Like]. Novaya gazeta, 18 October. https://www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2010/10/18/1080-sergey-semenovich-vot-on-kakoy
  40. Romashkina G. F., Davydenko V. A. (eds.). 2015. Sotsiokul’turnaya dinamika — portret Tyumenskoy oblasti: kollektivnaya monografiya [Sociocultural Dynamics — A Portrait of the Tyumen Region: A Collective Monograph]. Tyumen: TSU Publishing House.
  41. RF Innovation Development Strategy until 2020. Approved by RF Government Resolution of 8 December 2011, no 2227 r; RF State Programme “Razvitie promyshlennosti i povyshenie ee konkurentosposobnosti na period do 2020 g.” [Development of Industry and Enhancing Its Competitiveness until 2020]. Approved by RF Government Resolution of 27 December 2012, no 2539 r; State Programme of Science and Technologies Development. Approved by RF Government Resolution of 20 December 2012 g, no 2433 r; RF State Programme “Razvitie ekonomiki i innovatsionnaya ekonomika” [Development of the Economy and Innovative Economy]. Approved by RF Government Resolution of 29 March 2013, no 467 r.
  42. Alekseev V. V., Kradin N. N., Korotaev A. V., Grinin L. E. (eds.). 2014. Teoriya i metodologiya istorii [Theory and Methodology of History]. Volgograd: Uchitel.
  43. RF President’s Decrees of 7 May 2012, no 596-606 “Ob osnovnykh napravleniyakh sotsial’no ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii” [On the Main Directions of the Social and Economic Development of Russia]. 
  44. RBK. 2017. “Federal’naya antimonopol’naya sluzhba podgotovila prezidentskiy ukaz o snizhenii gosudarstvennogo uchastiya v ekonomike” [The Federal Antimonopoly Service Prepared a Presidential Decree on Reducing State Participation in the Economy]. RBK, 8 February. 
  45. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki (Rosstat) [Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat)]. Accessed on 10 January 2017. http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/enterprise/industrial/# 
  46. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki (Rosstat) [Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat)]. Accessed on 31 January 2017. http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/accounts/# 
  47. Federal’naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki (Rosstat) [Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat)]. Published on 2 February 2017; accessed on 10 February 2017. https://www.fedstat.ru/indicator/34475.do.
  48. Fligstin N. 2013. Arkhitektura rynkov: ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya kapitalisticheskikh obshchestv XXI veka [The Architecture of Markets: The Economic Sociology of Capitalist Societies of the 21st Century]. Translated from English by A. A. Kurakin; edited by V. V. Radaev. “Sotsial’naya teoriya” series. Moscow: HSE Publishing House. 
  49. Tsvetkov V. 2013. “My dolzhny svoi ‘nedostatki’ prevrashchat’ v dostoinstva” [We Must Turn Our “Shortcomings” into Our Dignities]. Rossiyskaya Federatsiya segodnya, no 11.
  50. Shumkov V. M. 2015. “Administrativnye tekhnologii soprovozhdeniya investorov v Tyumenskoy oblasti” [Administrative Technologies for Investor Support in the Tyumen Region]. Nalogi, investitsii, kapital, no 1 (100), pp. 64-66.
  51. Shumkov V. M. 2016. “Tyumenskaya ekonomika prodolzhit rasti” [Tyumen Economy Will Continue Growing]. Tyumenskaya liniya, 31 December. Accessed on 10 January 2017. http://t-l.ru/219959.html
  52. Baker W. E. 1984. “The Social Structure of a National Securities Market”. American Journal of Sociology, vol. 89, no 4, pp. 775-811.
  53. Biggart N. 1998. Charismatic Capitalism: Direct Selling Organizations in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  54. Fligstein N. 1990.The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  55. Powell W., DiMaggio P. (eds.). 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  56. Zukin S., DiMaggio P. 1990. “Introduction”. In: Powell W., DiMaggio P. (eds.). Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy, pp. 1-36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.