The Image of Russia in Contemporary Representations by the Population of the Border Regions

Release:

2017, Vol. 1. №1

Title: 
The Image of Russia in Contemporary Representations by the Population of the Border Regions


For citation: Maksimova S. G., Morkovkina A. G. 2017. “The Image of Russia in Contemporary Representations by the Population of the Border Regions”. Siberian Socium, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 57-61. DOI: 10.21684/2587-8484-2017-1-1-57-61

About the authors:

Svetlana G. Maksimova, Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Professor, Head of the Department of Psychology of Communication and Psychotechnologies, Altai State University (Barnaul, Russian Federation); eLibrary AuthorID, ORCID, Web of Science ResearcherID, Scopus AuthorID, svet-maximova@yandex.ru

Anastasia G. Morkovkina, Postgraduate Student, Department of Sociology of Communication Systems, Faculty of Sociology, Lomonosov Moscow State University; ggmork@mail.ru; soccomsys@mail.ru

Abstract:

This article analyses some of the components of the image of Russia in eight border regions of the Urals, Siberia and the Far East. The study reveals that most of the inhabitants of the border regions associate Russia with a controversial image. The image’s positive features are related to the international prestige of Russia, its historic achievements and cultural heritage. The negative ones are determined by low standard of living, social inequality and the imperfection of the economic system. A considerable part of the research focuses on the emotional elements of the image of Russia. The research shows that the parameters of identification of border region citizens with the Russian community vary considerably depending on a number of factors. The most important factors include such sociodemographic characteristics as age, gender, level of material well-being and region of residence. The Jewish Autonomous Region has the highest level of identity with the Russian community in almost all the parameters. The Zabaykalsky Krai shows the highest level of emotional identity in comparison to the other regions. The citizens of the Omsk Region, the Orenburg Region and the Republic of Altai have a much lower level of identification with the Russian community. On the basis of the results obtained, we make conclusions about the influence of the sociocultural specificity of the border regions on their citizens’ image of Russia.

References:

  1. Dinnie K. 2008. Nation Branding. Concepts, Issues, Practice. Oxford.
  2. Fedorov A. 2013. “The Image of Russia on the Western Screen in the Ideological Confrontation Epoch (1946-1991): From the Late Stalinism to the ‘Thaw’, from ‘Détente’ and ‘Stagnation’ to the ‘Perestroika’”. European Researcher, vol. (53), no 6-2, pp. 1772-1786.
  3. Grinberg T. E. 2008. Obraz strany ili imidzh gosudarstva: poisk konstruktivnoy modeli [The Image of the Country or the Image of the State: in Search of a Constructive Model]. Mediaskop. Reklama i PR, no 2. Accessed 25 January 2017. http://www.mediascope.ru/node/252
  4. Kaloeva E. S. 2014. “Osobennosti politiko-socialnogo obraza Rossii v sovremennom mire cherez analiz soderzhaniya zarubezhnyh pechatnyh SMI” [Political and Social Peculiarities of the Image of Russia in the Contemporary World through the Analysis of International Mass Media]. Proceedings of the 5th international research conference “Molodye uchenye v reshenii aktualnyh problem nauki”, pp. 538-541. Vladikavkaz: Severo-Osetinskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet im. K. L. Hetagurova.
  5. Kirkin A. N. 2006. “Formirovanie obraza gosudarstva v politicheskom soznanii rossiyan: osobennosti i tendentsii” [The Formation of the Image of the Country in the Russians’ Political Collective Consciousness]. Cand. Sci. (Polit.) diss. Moscow: Moscow State University.
  6. Krasnitskaya A. V., Achmiz A. Yu. 2014. “Narodnoe edinstvo i ideologicheskoe mnogoobrazie: rol i mesto v obespechenii territorialnoy tselostnosti gosudarstva (na primere Rossiyskoy Federatsii i respubliki Ukraina)” [National Unity and Ideological Plurality: the Role of State in Ensuring Territorial Unity]. Gumanitarnye, socialno-ekonomicheskie i obshhestvennye nauki, no 4. pp. 243-246.
  7. Pew Research Center. Global Attitudes & Trends. 2014. “Russia’s Global Image Negative amid Crisis in Ukraine”. Accessed 25 January 2017. http://www.pewglobal.org/2014/07/09/russias-global-image-negative-amid-crisis-in-ukraine
  8. Sidorova O. 2016. “Images of the Russian People and Russia in the Contemporary English Novel”. Quaestio Rossica, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 183-194. DOI: 10.15826/qr.2016.2.166
  9. Sidorskaya I. V. 2015. “‘Obraz’ ili ‘imidzh’ strany: chto reprezentiruyut SMI” [The Image of Russia in Mass Media]. Elektronnaya Bibilioteka BGU. OBSHESTVENNYE NAUKI: Massovaja kommunikaciya. Zhurnalistika. Sredstva massovoy informacii. Pskovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet. Accessed 25 January 2017. http://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/123210 
  10. Simchera Ya. V. 2003. “Vneshnyaya migraciya naseleniya v sovremennoy Rossii” [External Migration in Modern Russia]. Cand. Sci. (Econ.) diss. Moscow: Moscow State University.
  11. Smirnov S. N., Kapustin A. K., Isaev N. I. 2012. “Obraz Rossii: mezhdu proshlym i budushhim?” [The Image of Russians: Between the Past and the Future?]. Mir Rossii, no 4, pp. 63-90.
  12. Stepanova I. 2007. Mezhdunarodnyy imidzh Rossii cherez prizmu instrumentalnogo podhoda [The International Image of Russia through the Prism of the Instrumental Approach]. Korporativnaya imidzhelogiya, no 1(1). Accessed 25 January 2017. http://www.ci-journal.ru/article/66/200701rezenzia_galumov
  13. Tsentr ekonomicheskogo razvitiya i sertifikatsii. 2016. Narodnoe edinstvo i grazhdanskaya identichnost: v poiskah orientirov [National Unity and Civic Identity: Searching for Guiding Marks]. Kompetentsii uspeha, 7 November. Accessed 25 January 2017. http://profiok.com/about/news/detail.php?ID=3515#ixzz4RO2MXVss